JUSTICE AND DIALOGUE

This Law and Justice Essay was donated to you by students like you who want to improve your writing style and abilities. This essay or term paper is intended for reading purposes only. As it is written by other students it can serve as a valuable example of how essays or term papers should be written. To get a professionally written, high quality, authentic paper, please use our Custom Writing Services. If you have an essay to donate please read our submission details here.

Participation in dialogue does help people further their goal in social justice, although it does not occur every time. The dialogue involved at least two participants who are able to contribute to the topic under discussion and serve various roles upholding consciously or unconsciously the rules by which people play in the society. Here are the main ways how dialogue helps further the goal of social justice:

1. There are several participants (2+) in the dialogue, thus there is no single person who is able to have the ultimate power in the decision making process.

2. Dialogue allows people to peacefully agree on the rules by which to play. Therefore, it is the group of people who agree on what justice obey. The people who establish the dialogue, therefore, are "expected to be the first to obey the social justice".

3. Dialogue makes the behavior more predictable, work more efficient, and goals more clear. In other words, if there were no dialogue between the capitalists and the socialists prior to the capitalist's decision to establish the firm in the socialist land, the capitalist would be surprised to find out that it is normal for the country to nationalize the company at a whim. On the other hand the socialist operating in the capitalist land is more likely to expect the government subsidy and assistance and "would be disappointed not to get any".

Yet, still I need to note that just like all groups, people involving in dialogues might fail to uphold justice. Therefore, they must constantly think whether or not the human rights are not violated. For instance, in the Nazi Germany, it was just to discriminate against the Jews, Slavs, Africans, etc-it was the majority of population that supported this justice which in fact violated the human rights. In the Soviet Union, it was perfectly just to put a person into prison without investigation, if the secret service received an anonymous letter that pointed at that person as the "anti-communist". Thus, one has to understand that although the dialogue for the most part allow to further goal in social justice, it does not always occur in practice.

3. Do you think allies play a role in achieving social justice? Why or Why not?

Allies certainly play an important role in achieving social justice. One should not forget that the Allies represent an interest group that is able to "exercise influence on other people". If the allies represent a majority, than in this case the social justice is usually going to prevail. There are numerous instances when the allies forced the achievement of social justice. The countries like Yugoslavia got the social justice established after the Euro and the US allies managed to pressure and oust the hostile regime out of the country. In the case with Iraq, Allies (United Nations) objected the US involvement in the war, yet they could not exercise that much pressure on the US, and "the USA ultimately started the Iraqi campaign". On a personal level, the allies play absolutely the same role as they do on the country or international level.

EssayPlant.com professional writers can assist you in preparation of your Law and Politics Essays. Their writing experience allows them to grasp the topic and quickly develop a successful essay. Do not procrastinate, order Custom Law Paper now!